Punjab Government Appeals Supreme Court Over CBI Investigation Order

The Punjab government contests a High Court ruling mandating a CBI probe into corruption allegations linked to the Chief Minister's Office.

A
Aapla Nagpur Desk
6 Oct 2026, 10:52 AM IST · 2 min read
Source: Livelaw
Punjab Government Appeals Supreme Court Over CBI Investigation Order
KEY TAKEAWAYS
1

Punjab government files a Special Leave Petition against High Court's CBI investigation order.

2

Allegations involve corruption linked to Chief Minister Bhagwant Mann's office.

3

The High Court directed the CBI to investigate after claims of police inaction on ED communications.

The Punjab government has approached the Supreme Court to challenge a recent order from the Punjab and Haryana High Court that mandated the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) to initiate a criminal investigation into corruption allegations associated with the office of Chief Minister Bhagwant Mann. This Special Leave Petition (SLP) was filed in response to the High Court's directive issued on October 2, 2026, which instructed the CBI to register a case concerning allegations against Rajbir Singh Ghuman, an Officer on Special Duty to the Chief Minister.

The urgency of the matter was highlighted by Senior Advocate Vikas Singh, representing the Punjab government, who sought an immediate hearing from Chief Justice of India Surya Kant. However, the Chief Justice declined to schedule the hearing for the same day, suggesting that it could be listed for the following days. Singh argued that the allegations stem from the transfers and postings of state officers and claimed that the case was politically motivated, particularly given the upcoming elections.

Singh contended that the High Court's order was based on the assertion that the Punjab Police failed to act on information provided by the Enforcement Directorate (ED) under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act. He emphasized that police action is warranted only if the information indicates a cognizable offense, asserting that the High Court's direction contradicted a previous Supreme Court ruling in the Vijay Madanlal Chaudhary case.

The High Court's decision arose from a Public Interest Litigation filed by advocate Nikhil Saraf, which alleged that the Punjab Police had neglected to investigate despite receiving communications from the ED regarding Ghuman. The ED's submissions indicated that Ghuman was involved in facilitating various favors from the Punjab government, including transfers, access to confidential documents, and arms licenses.

As the Punjab government seeks to overturn the High Court's directive, the implications of this case extend beyond the immediate legal context, raising questions about governance and accountability within the state. The Supreme Court's forthcoming decisions will be closely monitored, particularly as they relate to the political climate in Punjab, which is gearing up for elections.

💬What did you think of this story?What did you think?

Read Next