Neha Bora Defends Regime Change in Democracy at Delhi High Court
Neha Bora argues for the legitimacy of seeking regime change during a court hearing regarding her protest activities.
Neha Bora, AISA President, asserts no wrongdoing in advocating regime change.
The court hearing follows her challenge against a peace bond notice linked to a recent protest.
Justice Subramonium Prasad reserved judgment after a lengthy hearing, with a decision expected soon.
Neha Bora, the National President of the All India Students Association (AISA), presented her case in the Delhi High Court on October 22, asserting that there is nothing inappropriate about seeking regime change within a democratic framework. This statement was made during a hearing concerning her petition against a notice requiring her to execute a personal bond of ₹10,000 to ensure peace following her involvement in the 'Lehra Do Tiranga' protest on October 16.
The legal proceedings were marked by a contention between Bora's legal representation and the Additional Solicitor General, Chetan Sharma. Sharma referenced a joint press conference attended by Bora, where statements regarding regime change were made. In response, senior advocate Gopal Sankarnarayan, representing Bora, emphasized the democratic right to pursue regime change, countering the ASG's assertion that such changes should occur through voting rather than through disruptive actions.
The court session extended over two and a half hours, during which Justice Subramonium Prasad listened to arguments from both sides before reserving judgment. The court is expected to announce its decision on Friday at 6 PM. Bora's legal challenge stems from an October 17 notice issued by a Special Executive Magistrate, which cited potential breaches of peace related to her protest activities.
Bora's petition seeks to quash the notice and prevent any coercive actions from authorities. She claims that her protest, which aimed to peacefully unfurl the national flag at Central Park in Connaught Place, was mischaracterized. She alleges that she was detained without cause and held overnight before her release on October 17. The notice she received accuses her of inciting protests despite prohibitory orders and alleges that she encouraged participation in the October 16 gathering.
The petition argues that the notice lacks sufficient evidence to justify the preventive measures imposed under Section 126 of the BNSS, which requires a clear indication of a potential breach of peace before such actions can be taken. Bora's legal team, which includes several advocates alongside Sankarnarayan, is prepared to contest the legitimacy of the notice in the upcoming court ruling.
