Madras High Court Issues Notice on Inquiry into CJP Spokesperson Saurav Das
The Madras High Court has responded to a plea for a background check on Saurav Das, calling for action against his social media activities.
The court has issued a notice regarding a plea against CJP spokesperson Saurav Das.
The plea seeks to investigate Das's background and block his social media accounts.
The hearing is set to resume in six weeks.
On October 30, 2026, the Madras High Court issued a notice in response to a petition seeking an inquiry into the background of Saurav Das, spokesperson for the Cockroach Janata Party (CJP). The plea, filed by Ganesh Kumar from Kanchipuram District, alleges that Das has made derogatory remarks about the judiciary and Supreme Court judges, prompting the request for a thorough investigation.
The petition calls for the cancellation of Das's passport and Aadhaar Card, as well as blocking his social media accounts, including Instagram and Twitter. The court's bench, comprising Chief Justice SA Dharmadhikari and Justice G Arul Murugan, directed several government bodies to respond to the notice, including the Regional Passport Officer in Chennai and the Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology.
During the proceedings, Advocate B Jagannath, representing the petitioner, emphasized the need for an inquiry into Das's statements, arguing that they undermine the integrity of the judiciary. He expressed frustration over previous complaints that had not led to any action, which motivated him to file this petition.
The implications of this case extend beyond individual accountability, raising concerns about the impact of social media on public discourse regarding the judiciary. The court's decision to issue a notice reflects a growing awareness of the need to address potentially harmful statements made online.
The court has scheduled the next hearing for six weeks from now, indicating that further developments in this case will be closely monitored as it unfolds. The outcome may set a precedent for how similar cases involving public figures and their statements about the judiciary are handled in the future.
