Supreme Court to Review Allegations Against Rahul Gandhi
The Supreme Court will hear claims that Rahul Gandhi pushed a pregnant journalist during a protest on October 12.
Rahul Gandhi is accused of pushing a pregnant journalist during a protest.
The incident allegedly occurred on October 12 at the Supreme Court.
The application was presented by Senior Advocate Gaurav Bhatia.
On October 16, 2026, the Supreme Court of India agreed to consider an application alleging that Rahul Gandhi, the Leader of the Opposition, pushed a pregnant journalist during a protest on October 12. The incident reportedly took place within the Supreme Court premises as Gandhi and other opposition leaders marched to file a petition against the Election Commission of India.
The application was brought forward by Senior Advocate Gaurav Bhatia, who addressed a bench led by Chief Justice Surya Kant and Justice Joymalya Bagchi. Bhatia highlighted that this application is part of a broader petition filed by advocate Digant Mishra, which seeks to impose restrictions on political demonstrations within court premises.
During a previous hearing related to protests in Delhi, Bhatia referenced the alleged incident involving the journalist, who was reportedly three months pregnant at the time. He emphasized the need for the court to take cognizance of the situation, suggesting that the journalist faced selective outrage due to her reporting against Gandhi. The Chief Justice, however, noted that the court could not acknowledge oral submissions without a formal application.
The implications of this case extend beyond the individual allegations, raising questions about the conduct of political leaders during protests and the safety of journalists covering such events. The Supreme Court's decision to hear the application may set a precedent regarding the accountability of public figures in similar situations.
Looking ahead, the court's examination of this application will be pivotal in determining the next steps. The legal community and the public will be watching closely as the Supreme Court addresses the intersection of politics, media, and the law in this high-profile case.
